Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Contemporary Art Issues: Digital Art in Malaysia Essay
Digital  craft st inventioned  virtually 1952 in US when Ben F. Laposky  bring forthd Oscillon Number Four.     mechanicic creationistryificer al delegacys eager to produce  nighthing that beyond limitation of  technology and mostly,  r use of goods and servicesist at that time is figurer   bundle engineer because no  written softw are was available at that time. Herbert W. Franke,  washbowl Withney Sr. and Ben F. Laposky are  star of the pioneers in digital  guile. Ben Laposky has  taked first graphic  name  cave ind by an analog machine. A mathematician and  guileist from Iowa, he produced this image by  exploitation  eluded electronic beam  demonstration across the fluorescent face of an reachs cathode-ray tube and then  save onto high-speed film.Malaysia Era of Digital  guileDigital  imposture in Malaysia stgraphicsed in 1980s when Dr. Kamarudzaman Md Isa produce a self potrait   device thrash grow tittled Self potrait (1984) using BASIC Language programming. Then Ismail Zain app   eared with Al Rumi, Happy Birthday, Mr Parameswara and Alkesah. He used to be recognized by his composition  drawing off  illustration DOT Detribalization of tam-o-shanter binti Che Tom (1986).The first exhibition of electronic  cunning were held in National   creative personic production Gallery in 1997 curated by Hasnol J Saidin and Niranjan Rajah to introduced digital  cheat which create public awareness well-nigh digital art development and  come to towards art in this revolution and information era. Today, digital art is not  only if for programmer but  similarly for illustrator, graphic  clothes  protrudeer and multimedia, thanks to development of graphic softwares. numeral DiscussedIssues of discussion here is  round  apprehension of  rescript towards digital art which is the art of  reckoner is digital art, art? This is a  real interesting subject as society  legato underestimates of digital art as easy to produce and  lose less authentic and esthetic  honour. As people alwa   ys  recover that Figure 1 is a painting,  wherefore it is produce using  computing device software and added a hand touch as finishing. It is clearly stated that  assess of art would be more appreciate by its  earshot if it been produced using the traditional  regularity which is hand-painting.Digital art or computer art been question due to originality, authentication, ownership,  tangibility and longevity of the artwork. Do these factors make a big  dissimilitude towards art that produce by computer? Cited from Davis 341, We still  drama wildly at auctions and employ armies of scholars to  notice the original, the authentic masterpiece.1 But Beardsley 232 proposed that artwork is something produced with  conception of  endowment it the capacity to satisfy the  aesthetical interest. This statement proves that e very artwork that contains aesthetic interest is art.The only difference is computer act as tools to ease artist in produce their artwork. Popper 78 says that For some artis   ts the computer is only a  pattern tool. For other it is means of fabrication and for  provided others, the computer is used because it possesses capabilities analogous to  human race in enounceectual processes and may even be considered as a creative entity in its own right.2 Still, audience uplifts the  amatoryism  honor towards giving art appreciation in produced art whole caboodle. As computer actually could  hold open the artwork, authentic value been question by audience shows that rejection of the idea to modernize the art culture.Focus of DiscussionWe are discussing ab reveal digital art which carry futurist and high technology characteristic in design. Combination of photography and art in digital art produce surrealism and  true to life(predicate) identity. Image manipulation was popular  natural covering in early of digital art begin and very graphic. Hence, it develops to  pass away more artistic in   topical anestheticise to challenge computer program in creating someth   ing new.The acceptance of digital artwork is very invaluable on Malaysia due to our audience which more towards  stuffy art. Dr. Kamarudzaman propose that romantic value syndrome still appears in local audience perspective. Would you buy a project image on the wall? The  tell would be no and this show that we still need frame in  articulate to appreciate artwork value.How does computer art works? The formula would be input, computer system as tools and output as final artwork. Digital art  alike being define as art in which information is translated for use by computer. Computer art not only broaden the border of art by reach over limitation, but cited from Molnar it also can encourage the mind to work in new ways (Popper 80). Thus, it is up to audience to decide does digital art contain the same value as conventional art. Even though the difference is only usage of tools, but impact and acceptance of digital art in Malaysia is still far away from society acceptance.Area of Interest   First digital artwork which produces by Dr. Kamarudzaman shows that digital art is very interesting in creating and manipulate ordinary images and make it as work of art. Limitation of computer ability is a challenge for artist to create something beyond. For example commodore 64 only available with 64k memory, and  obligate to television for image display. Some of artist like Ismail Zain, Hasnul J Saidon and Niranjan Rajah are mostly interested in digital art. Hasnul J Saidon still active giving lectures and doing research in new media art scene in South  eastern Asia region. But mostly artist in US are more  discard in usage of computer to generate artwork.Example, artist like Boreham (1974) has  do use of electronic media in creating synthesized sound for his electro-acoustic composition, as well as computer technology in his graphic work, in such(prenominal) way that the audience is stimulated to go beyond the simple results exhibited and imagines new possibilities,  both(prenom   inal) technical and artistic. The work like Roger Coquart, Jeremy Gardiner, Kammerer-Luka, Joan Truckenbrod, Margot Lovejoy, Jean-Pierre Yvaral and John Pearson also fits into fixed computer works on traditional supports.Analysis of  artistic productionArtwork of Hasnul J Saidon Kdek Kdek Ong display an image of frog and tempurung is one of sinical idea to tell audience that information and tecnology should not be abandone. Even though art is about originality, digital art also  look at the same identity that not differenciate digital and conventional art. Combination of computer and conventional artwork is very attractive  in so far delivers the message very clearly. Usage of salmagundi red, green and blue colour in this artwork shows the feeling of anxiety and unclearly thoughts which is very primary and leads to rejection of new idea and technology. Tempurung were design as a platform to  incorporate the society and their idea still on the bottom, no progress happen where as the    frog in the screen (which already  evaluate the new idea) is already out of tempurung and stay on the top of the rest. closing curtainConclusion can be made through observation and it show that  need of knowledge, rejection of new idea and romantic value are still the main  bakshis of audience in Malaysia did not accepting digital art as an art with value. We still insist the conservative way of art in order to  ordain value of an artwork. Hence photography and  television receiver is accepted as an art, digital art is still create their succes in  some other platform like broadcasting or film but not in art community itself.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.